HomeExpansionismChina Bullies Vietnam on Maritime Boundaries

China Bullies Vietnam on Maritime Boundaries

Published on

spot_img

In a significant development that has captured the attention of the international community, China has unilaterally announced a new baseline in the Gulf of Tonkin, an area of strategic and economic importance it shares with Vietnam. This announcement, delineating sovereignty through a series of seven base points, diverges sharply from established agreements and the foundational principles of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). At its core, the situation embodies a profound challenge to Vietnamese territory and sovereignty, sparking concerns over China’s territorial ambitions and the broader implications for international maritime law and regional stability.

The Gulf of Tonkin, referred to as Beibu Gulf in China, has historically been a delicate zone of maritime demarcation between Vietnam and China. In 2000, both nations reached a consensus on their maritime boundaries within the Gulf, a resolution that was heralded as a milestone in bilateral relations. However, China’s recent actions have cast a shadow over this agreement, with experts and analysts raising alarms over the potential motivations and consequences of the newly declared baseline.

Maritime experts, including Carl Thayer, an emeritus professor at the Australian Defence Force Academy, have labeled the new baseline as “excessive,” suggesting that it could lead to a more substantial overlap of China’s exclusive economic zone with areas previously agreed upon for joint usage between Vietnam and China. This would not only complicate maritime activities but also infringe upon the spirit of mutual respect and cooperation that underscored the original 2000 agreement. The baseline’s purported divergence from UNCLOS norms, particularly in terms of distance from the coast, has also been criticized for lacking compliance with international maritime law.

In the face of China’s announcement, Vietnam’s response has been characterized by a diplomatic yet firm insistence on adherence to international law and the existing bilateral agreement. Pham Thu Hang, spokeswoman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Vietnam, articulated this stance clearly, stating, “Vietnam asks that China respect and abide by the agreement on the delimitation of the territorial sea, exclusive economic zone and continental shelf of the two countries in the Gulf of Tonkin, signed in 2000, and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).” This call for respect and adherence underscores Vietnam’s commitment to a resolution grounded in the principles of international law and mutual respect.

Vietnam’s diplomatic approach, emphasizing dialogue and understanding, reflects its desire to maintain regional peace and stability. Nonetheless, the situation presents a complex challenge, touching upon critical issues such as freedom of navigation, scientific research, and the laying of cables or pipelines. The expansion of internal waters as implied by China’s new baseline could significantly restrict access to other countries, contravening the principles of free passage and navigation that are central to UNCLOS.

The broader ramifications of China’s unilateral move extend beyond the immediate concerns of Vietnam. They signal a potential shift in the dynamics of territorial claims in contested waters, particularly in a region as strategically pivotal as the South China Sea. The international community’s reaction and the resolution of this dispute may well set a precedent for how similar challenges are addressed in the future, making it a test case for the resilience of international maritime law and the principle of sovereign equality among nations.

In summary, the unfolding situation in the Gulf of Tonkin between Vietnam and China is more than a bilateral dispute; it is a litmus test for the international legal framework governing maritime boundaries and sovereignty. How these two nations navigate this dispute, and how the international community responds, will have lasting implications for regional stability, the sanctity of international agreements, and the future of maritime law in the face of territorial ambitions.

Latest articles

The TikTok: China’s Information Influence Operations Reaching 170 Million Americans

In a revealing interview with Fox News Digital, Michael Sobolik, a prominent China expert...

Biden Advised to Prevent China from Dumping EVs on U.S.

Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio has called for a ban on Chinese-made electric vehicles...

China is Building Weapons for Russia

Recent U.S. intelligence assessments have shed light on China's substantial involvement in supporting Russia's...

Weak: Secretary Blinken Approaches China, Turkey and Saudi Arabia to Reason with Iran

Recent diplomatic initiatives spearheaded by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken demonstrate a serious...

More like this

The TikTok: China’s Information Influence Operations Reaching 170 Million Americans

In a revealing interview with Fox News Digital, Michael Sobolik, a prominent China expert...

Biden Advised to Prevent China from Dumping EVs on U.S.

Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio has called for a ban on Chinese-made electric vehicles...

China is Building Weapons for Russia

Recent U.S. intelligence assessments have shed light on China's substantial involvement in supporting Russia's...